Legal Cyber Academy
Case law repository

United States v. Hassan

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Federal circuit court)
Decided
2014
Citation
742 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 2014)
Standard applied
FRE 902(11) with FRE 803(6) and 901 — platform records plus linkage
Evidence or expert admittedAuthentication
Read the full opinion742 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 2014) · full text on CourtListener

What the court held

Screenshots of Facebook pages and YouTube videos were self-authenticating as business records under Rule 902(11), supported by certifications from the platforms' records custodians. That was not the end of the inquiry: the trial court also required the government to prove under Rule 901 that the pages were linked to the defendants, and the exhibits were admitted only once that showing was made.

Why

Rule 902(11) permits admission of records satisfying the business-records requirements as shown by a custodian's certification, and the certifications established that the platforms created and retained the material in the course of regularly conducted activity. The court treated the custodial certification and the attribution showing as two separate requirements, satisfied here by the biographical content, interests and posting history on each page.

Our reading — not the court’s words

Why this matters in practice

Hassan is the affirmative template that Browne, Griffin and Vayner describe in the negative: custodial certification for the record, independent evidence for the person. Practitioners should read it as a checklist for assembling a social-media exhibit — obtain the platform certification through legal process, then build the linkage separately. It also shows that screenshots are not disqualified as a capture method when the platform record backs them up.

This paragraph is Legal Cyber Academy’s editorial assessment of the decision’s practical importance. The court said none of it. For what the court actually said, read the opinion.

Additional detail

Tags: Facebook · YouTube · Rule 902(11) · business records · screenshot

Cited 185times in CourtListener’s corpus at the time this entry was compiled. Treat it as a rough measure of influence, not of correctness.

Summarised from the opinion as retrieved from CourtListener. Reference material, not legal advice. Back to the repository.