The spine of the discipline: what a competent examiner is expected to have done, written down by bodies a court will recognise. Read these first, and check for a newer revision before you cite one.
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 5.0, published 2026-07-09 · 2026 · SWGDE 17-F-001-5.0
SWGDE's guidance on analysing historical call detail records and cell site data to reason about where a handset was, and on the limits of that reasoning. The…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
Forensic Science Regulator (England and Wales) · Version 2, published 5 June 2025; came into force 2 October 2025 · 2025
The statutory code of practice the Forensic Science Regulator is required to publish under the Forensic Science Regulator Act 2021, setting quality standard…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
Ramaswamy Chandramouli, Eric Hibbard · National Institute of Standards and Technology · Revision 2, September 2025 · 2025 · NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2
NIST's guidance on clearing, purging and destroying data on storage media, including media-specific techniques and verification. Revision 2 was published in…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
International Organization for Standardization · Edition 1, published 2025-06 · 2025 · ISO 21043-4:2025
A 14-page international standard on the interpretation of forensic findings, published in June 2025 as part of the ISO 21043 forensic sciences series. Parts 1…
Working examinerLawyers and courtsAdvanced
International Organization for Standardization · Edition 1, published 2025-06 · 2025 · ISO 21043-5:2025
A 10-page international standard specifying requirements for forensic reports and for the communication of findings, published June 2025 as part of the ISO…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
Federal Judicial Center / National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · Fourth edition, published December 31, 2025 (the two volumes carry a March 2026 date) · 2025
The judiciary's own reference work on scientific and technical evidence, produced jointly by the Federal Judicial Center and the National Academies, made up…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 2.1, published 2025-08-05 · 2025 · SWGDE 17-F-002-2.1
SWGDE's guidance on acquiring data from computers and computer storage, including write blocking, live versus dead acquisition, verification and the handling…
Working examiner
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 2.0, published 2025-11-20 · 2025 · SWGDE 18-F-002-2.0
SWGDE's core on-scene collection document, covering preparation, data integrity and security, acquisition approaches, hashing and documentation. The version…
Working examiner
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 2.0, published 2025-08-21 · 2025 · SWGDE 18-F-003-2.0
SWGDE's guidance on the front half of mobile device work: isolating and preserving a seized handset, handling power and network state, and choosing among…
Working examiner
The Sedona Conference · Post-public-comment version, October 2025 · 2025
A consensus commentary on when mobile device data is within the scope of civil discovery and how to collect and produce it proportionately, covering…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
The Sedona Conference · Sixth edition, December 2025 (fifth edition February 2020, published in The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 21) · 2025
A controlled vocabulary for ediscovery and digital information management, defining the terms that appear in ESI protocols, expert reports, and court orders.
New to the fieldLawyers and courtsWorking examiner
Martin Herman, Michaela Iorga, Ahsen Michael Salim, Robert Jackson, Mark Hurst, Ross Leo, Anand Kumar Mishra, Nancy Landreville, Yien Wang · National Institute of Standards and Technology · July 2024 (final; initial public draft February 2023) · 2024 · NIST SP 800-201
The successor work to NISTIR 8006: a forensic reference architecture that maps the challenges onto the NIST cloud computing reference architecture and…
Advanced
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 1.1, published 2024-02-02 · 2024 · SWGDE 23-Q-001-1.1
SWGDE's guidance for examiners who have to present digital evidence in court or other proceedings, covering preparation, exhibits, scope of testimony and…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence · Version 2.1, published 2024-03-07 · 2024 · SWGDE 18-Q-001-2.1
SWGDE's statement of the minimum a laboratory must do to test a tool before using it in casework, including what to record about the tool, the test data and…
Working examinerAdvanced
United States Courts (rule text as printed by the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives) · Amended April 24, 2023, effective December 1, 2023; credit line in the official print reads "As amended Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011; Apr. 24, 2023, eff. Dec. 1, 2023." · 2023
The federal admissibility rule for expert testimony. The 2023 amendment moved the burden into the rule text — the proponent must demonstrate to the court that…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examinerAdvanced
Eran Salfati, Michael Pease · National Institute of Standards and Technology · NISTIR 8428, 22 June 2022 · 2022 · NISTIR 8428
An incident-handling framework for operational technology environments, extending conventional DFIR with event-escalation-based response, OT-specific forensic…
Advanced
James R. Lyle, Barbara Guttman, John Butler, Kelly Sauerwein, Christina Reed, Corrine Lloyd · National Institute of Standards and Technology · NISTIR 8354, 21 November 2022 · 2022 · NISTIR 8354
NIST's scientific foundation review of digital forensics, examining the peer-reviewed literature, academic material and practitioner guidance behind digital…
AdvancedLawyers and courts
The Sedona Conference · August 2021; published in The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 22 (2021) · 2021
A consensus commentary on auto-deleting and disappearing-message applications: whether adopting them is defensible, what happens to the preservation duty when…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 2, published 2020-01; a systematic review closed 2025-06-05 · 2020 · ISO/IEC 27050-3:2020
A 27-page code of practice setting out requirements and guidance for each ediscovery activity, from initiating a matter and issuing preservation instructions…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
Martin Herman, Michaela Iorga, Ahsen Michael Salim, Robert Jackson, Mark Hurst, Ross Leo, Richard Lee, Nancy Landreville, Anand Kumar Mishra, Yien Wang, Rodrigo Sardinas · National Institute of Standards and Technology · NISTIR 8006, final, August 2020 · 2020 · NISTIR 8006
A catalogue produced by the NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Working Group that aggregates and categorises the forensic challenges of investigating…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
The Sedona Conference · Second edition, October 2020; published in The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 22 (2021). The first edition dates from March 2008 · 2020
A consensus commentary on getting electronically stored information into evidence — authentication, hearsay, best evidence, and the certification routes —…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
United States Courts (rule text as printed by the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives) · Both subsections added by the amendment of April 27, 2017, effective December 1, 2017; text verified against the official print current to December 1, 2024 · 2017
Two subsections of Rule 902 that let a party authenticate electronic evidence by written certification instead of live testimony: 902(13) covers a record…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 3, published 2017-11; reviewed and confirmed 2023 · 2017 · ISO/IEC 17025:2017
The 30-page accreditation standard against which forensic laboratories, including digital forensics units, are assessed for technical competence, impartiality…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
The Sedona Conference · Third edition, October 2017 · 2017
Fourteen consensus principles on producing electronically stored information in civil litigation, with commentary, revised to reflect the 2015 amendments to…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
European Network of Forensic Science Institutes · Version 01, November 2015 · 2015 · ENFSI-BPM-FIT-01
A 65-page manual from ENFSI's Forensic Information Technology working group covering personnel, equipment, accommodation, peer review, examination protocols,…
Working examiner
European Network of Forensic Science Institutes · Approved version 3.0; foreword dated 8 March 2015 · 2015
The output of ENFSI's STEOFRAE project (Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe): a guideline on evaluating findings against competing…
Working examinerLawyers and courtsAdvanced
United States Courts · Replaced in full by the amendment effective December 1, 2015 · 2015
The federal sanctions rule for lost ESI. It applies only where information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 1, published 2015-06; reviewed and confirmed 2021; a further systematic review closed 2026-09-03 · 2015 · ISO/IEC 27041:2015
An 18-page standard on showing that an investigative method is fit for purpose: capturing functional and non-functional requirements, describing the method,…
Working examinerAdvanced
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 1, published 2015-06; reviewed and confirmed 2021; a further systematic review closed 2026-09-03 · 2015 · ISO/IEC 27042:2015
A 14-page standard that picks up where ISO/IEC 27037 stops, covering the analysis and interpretation of potential digital evidence and the competence and…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 1, published 2015-03; reviewed and confirmed 2020; a further systematic review closed 2025-12-03 · 2015 · ISO/IEC 27043:2015
A 30-page standard setting out an idealised, process-class model for investigating incidents involving digital evidence, from readiness through…
Working examiner
Richard Ayers, Sam Brothers, Wayne Jansen · National Institute of Standards and Technology · Revision 1, May 2014 · 2014 · NIST SP 800-101 Rev. 1
NIST's guidance on seizing, preserving, acquiring and examining mobile phones and their associated media, including the acquisition-level model (manual,…
Working examiner
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission · Edition 1, published 2012-10; reviewed and confirmed 2018; a further systematic review closed 2023-12-03 · 2012 · ISO/IEC 27037:2012
A 38-page international standard covering the first four handling activities for potential digital evidence: identification, collection, acquisition and…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice · November 2009 · 2009 · NCJ 227050
A pocket flipbook companion to NIJ's first responder guide, condensing device types, scene securing, documentation, collection and packaging into an on-scene…
New to the field
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice · 2009 manual, still the version published on the CCIPS documents page · 2009
The Justice Department's own manual on the Fourth Amendment and statutory rules governing searches of computers and the acquisition of electronic evidence,…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice · Second edition, April 2008 · 2008 · NCJ 219941
NIJ's first-responder guide covering electronic device types and their potential evidence, on-scene tools and equipment, securing and documenting the scene,…
New to the field
The Sedona Conference · July 2008; reprinted in The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 10 Supplement · 2008
A short statement, endorsed by a large number of federal and state judges, that discovery is a non-adversarial exchange and that counsel have an obligation to…
Lawyers and courts
National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice · January 2007 · 2007 · NCJ 211314
An 81-page NIJ guide on the legal handling of digital evidence: search and seizure issues including the Fourth Amendment, the Electronic Communications…
Lawyers and courts
Karen Kent, Suzanne Chevalier, Tim Grance, Hung Dang · National Institute of Standards and Technology · August 2006 (final, published 1 September 2006) · 2006 · NIST SP 800-86
A NIST Special Publication that sets out a four-phase forensic process (collection, examination, analysis, reporting) and applies it to four data sources:…
New to the fieldWorking examiner
National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice · April 2004 · 2004 · NCJ 199408
An NIJ special report, produced by the Technical Working Group for the Examination of Digital Evidence, covering policy and procedure, evidence assessment,…
New to the fieldWorking examiner
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 23, 1999 · 1999 · 526 U.S. 137
The decision extending the Daubert gatekeeping obligation to all expert testimony under Rule 702, including technical and other specialized knowledge, and…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 28, 1993 · 1993 · 509 U.S. 579
The decision holding that the Federal Rules of Evidence, not Frye's general-acceptance test, govern expert scientific testimony, and that the trial judge acts…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
United States Courts (rule text as printed by the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives) · Enacted January 2, 1975; restyled by the amendment effective December 1, 2011; text verified against the official print current to December 1, 2024 · 1975
An illustration of sufficient authentication: "Evidence describing a process or system and showing that it produces an accurate result." It is the route by…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
American Bar Association · Current text of Comment [8] as published by the ABA and verified on 2026-09-12
The comment on maintaining competence, which provides that to maintain the requisite knowledge and skill a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law…
Lawyers and courtsWorking examiner
Forensic Science Regulator (England and Wales) · Issue 4; gov.uk page last updated 22 July 2024 · FSR-G-200
Guidance on the content of reports issued by expert witnesses in the criminal justice system of England and Wales, setting out the legal requirements for…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
INTERPOL
INTERPOL's guidance on establishing and managing a digital forensics laboratory, together with technical guidelines for managing and processing electronic…
Working examiner
Forensic Science Regulator (England and Wales) · Issue 2; gov.uk page last updated 22 July 2024 · FSR-G-218
The Regulator's guidance on applying the validation requirements of the code of practice to digital forensic methods: demonstrating that a method is fit for…
Working examinerAdvanced
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science, National Institute of Standards and Technology
A NIST-administered repository of forensic science standards that have passed technical and quality review by practitioners, researchers, statisticians and…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence
SWGDE's own listing of its published best practices, guidelines, technical notes, positions and considerations for digital and multimedia forensics, together…
Working examinerLawyers and courts
FreeSuperseded or dormant Association of Chief Police Officers · March 2012 · 2012
The UK guide that states the four ACPO principles for handling digital evidence — do not change the original data, record everything done, have a competent…
Working examinerLawyers and courtsNew to the field