Legal Cyber Academy

Continuing Education Information Sheet

Artificial Intelligence: Regulatory Status and Impact on the Practice of Law

Back to course
Provider
Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com
Delivery method
On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
Instructional time
59m
Assessment
Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.

Equivalent credit hours

0.9 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.1 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.

Learning objectives

  • Explain how AI and generative AI work
  • Identify the risks of using AI in the practice of law
  • Describe the state, federal, and international AI regulatory landscape
  • Assess AI's impact on the legal profession

Audience & prerequisites

Intended audience: Forward-thinking lawyers and technology executives wanting to understand AI regulation and use it responsibly.

Level: intermediate

Prerequisites: None

Faculty

  • Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard

    Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare

    Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.

  • Bradford Newman, Partner and Head of Complex Technology Disputes (US), Eversheds Sutherland

    Baker McKenzie

    Bradford Newman is a partner at Eversheds Sutherland and the firm's Head of Complex Technology Disputes (US), based in Silicon Valley, where he joined when the firm opened that office in 2025. He serves as lead trial counsel in national and cross-border high-stakes technology and trade secret litigation, and advises boards and C-suites on governance and regulatory risk in artificial intelligence, blockchain, decentralized finance and cryptocurrency. He is the founder and longtime co-chair of the American Bar Association's AI and Blockchain Subcommittee and edits the trade secrets chapter of the ABA Business Law Section's Annual Review. He previously chaired Baker McKenzie's North America Trade Secrets Practice, and is ranked by Chambers USA in trade secrets. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on ransomware and forensics, and on artificial intelligence and its regulation in legal practice.

  • Kristen Mathews, Partner, Cooley LLP

    Morrison & Foerster LLP

    Kristen Mathews is a partner in Cooley's global cyber/data/privacy group and litigation department in New York. Her work covers the treatment of personal and experiential information about individuals, cybersecurity preparedness and data breach incident response, and compliance with data privacy laws at the state, federal and international levels, as well as artificial intelligence, brain tech and the ethical ramifications of the use of AI. She joined Cooley in September 2024 from Morrison & Foerster. Chambers USA has ranked her since 2010 and The Legal 500 US inducted her into its Hall of Fame in the Cyber Law category. At Legal Cyber Academy she teaches on the regulatory status of artificial intelligence and its impact on the practice of law.

  • Antonio Tavares Paes, Partner, Costa e Tavares Paes Advogados

    Costa e Tavares Paes Advogados

    Antonio Tavares Paes Jr. is a partner at Costa e Tavares Paes Advogados in Brazil. His practice covers civil and corporate litigation, arbitration, commercial contracts, corporate law and M&A, capital markets, banking, data protection and digital law, and compliance, for clients in the engineering, energy and finance sectors. He previously held roles at White & Case LLP, Chase Manhattan Bank and Scudder Kemper Investments, and was a partner at Flecha de Lima & Tavares Paes Advogados and at Wald Associados Advogados. Chambers ranks him Band 2 in Dispute Resolution: Litigation (Mid-Market) in Brazil. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on artificial intelligence regulation and its impact on the practice of law.

Timed agenda

#TopicMinutes
1Artificial Intelligence: Regulatory Status and Impact on the Practice of Law59
Total instructional time59

Self-submission by credit type

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.

  • Addresses legal ethics / professional responsibility — may qualify for ethics-specialty CLE where your jurisdiction recognizes it.
  • CLE (attorneys)up to 0.9 hr (60-min basis)

    Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.

  • CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 0.9 hr (60-min basis)

    Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.