Legal Cyber Academy

Continuing Education Information Sheet

Attorney Rulebook for Working with Special Masters in Federal Court

Back to course
Provider
Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com
Delivery method
On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
Instructional time
1h 5m
Assessment
Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.

Equivalent credit hours

1.0 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.3 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.

Learning objectives

  • Understand the role, types, and advantages of special masters
  • Apply the rules governing appointment and scope of authority
  • Reference the 2019 ABA Guidelines for special masters
  • Follow best practices ('5 commandments') for working with special masters

Audience & prerequisites

Intended audience: Litigators handling complex federal cases involving discovery, cybersecurity, IP, or other technical matters.

Level: intermediate

Prerequisites: None

Faculty

  • Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard

    Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare

    Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.

  • Katherine Charonko, Partner and ESI Practice Group Leader, Bailey & Glasser

    Bailey & Glasser

    Katherine (Kate) Charonko is a Partner and ESI Practice Group Leader at Bailey & Glasser, where she helps clients and attorneys apply analytics across eDiscovery, including document review strategy, technology-assisted review, and ESI preservation and collection protocols. She serves on Bailey Glasser multidistrict litigation teams focused on automotive and medical-device product liability and has acted as liaison director of eDiscovery and ESI on several MDL leadership committees. Charonko speaks frequently on ESI, TAR, and legal ethics.

  • Leslie Kroeger, Partner, Cohen Milstein

    Cohen Milstein

    Leslie M. Kroeger is a Partner and Co-Chair of Cohen Milstein's Complex Tort Litigation practice, and an accomplished trial lawyer focused on product liability, environmental and toxic tort, consumer class action, and wrongful death litigation. She is a past president of the Council of Presidents for the American Association for Justice and a past president of the Florida Justice Association. Kroeger has been recognized on Lawdragon's leading-lawyers lists and repeatedly by Best Lawyers in America and Florida Super Lawyers.

  • Paul Kiesel, Partner, Kiesel Law LLP

    Kiesel Law LLP

    Paul Kiesel is a Partner at Kiesel Law LLP who represents individuals and families in significant personal injury and wrongful death matters, along with municipalities in major litigation. A longtime leader in the California legal community, he served as president of the Los Angeles County Bar Association and on the State of California Judicial Council's Civil and Small Claims Advisory Committee. He co-chairs the Open Courts Coalition and has been named a Senior Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America.

Timed agenda

#TopicMinutes
1Attorney Rulebook for Working with Special Masters in Federal Court 65
Total instructional time65

Self-submission by credit type

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.

  • CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

    Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.

  • CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

    Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.