Legal Cyber Academy

Continuing Education Information Sheet

Code and Conduct: Navigating the CFAA

Back to course
Provider
Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com
Delivery method
On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
Instructional time
1h 2m
Assessment
Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.

Equivalent credit hours

1.0 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.2 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.

Learning objectives

  • Explain the CFAA and its evolution
  • Define key terms used in applying the CFAA
  • Identify the seven categories of prohibited conduct
  • Assess damages, penalties, and recent case law under the CFAA

Audience & prerequisites

Intended audience: Attorneys handling hacking, computer crime, and cybersecurity litigation matters.

Level: intermediate

Prerequisites: None

Faculty

  • Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard

    Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare

    Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.

  • Catherine Castaldo, Partner, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

    Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

    Catherine R. Castaldo is a partner in the corporate and privacy and cybersecurity practices at Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP in New York, which she joined in February 2026. She advises clients on cybersecurity and privacy risk management, including incident preparedness and response, data privacy and protection strategy, information security, data governance, internal investigations and regulatory matters, drawing on more than 15 years in the field. She was previously Vice President, Global Chief Privacy Officer and Global Data Protection Officer at Nuance Communications and Global Chief Privacy and Data Protection Counsel at GE Capital. She holds a J.D., cum laude, from the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University and is admitted in New York and Massachusetts. At Legal Cyber Academy she teaches on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

  • Mark Mermelstein, Attorney, Holmes, Athey, Cowan & Mermelstein LLP

    Holmes Athey Cowan & Mermelstein · Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

    Mark Mermelstein practices at Holmes, Athey, Cowan & Mermelstein LLP in Los Angeles, the litigation boutique that carries his name. His work spans white collar criminal defense, SEC enforcement actions, and complex commercial litigation in technology and healthcare, along with cybersecurity and privacy matters involving trade secret theft, hacking, counterfeiting and data breaches. He leads data breach and incident response efforts and pursues asset recovery for corporate victims of cybercrime, and he has tried more than 20 cases as first chair. He previously practiced as a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Los Angeles, at a white collar defense boutique, and as a public defender. He earned his J.D. magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and is admitted in New York and California. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Timed agenda

#TopicMinutes
1Computer Fraud and Abuse Act62
2Seven Categories of Prohibited Conduct Under the CFAA
3Violating the CFAA
Total instructional time62

Self-submission by credit type

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.

  • CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

    Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.

  • CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

    Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.