Continuing Education Information Sheet
Cybercrime and Punishment: Understanding the U.S. v. Joe Sullivan Trial
- Provider
- Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com - Delivery method
- On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
- Instructional time
- 1h 3m
- Assessment
- Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
- Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.
Equivalent credit hours
1.0 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.2 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.
Learning objectives
- Summarize the facts and technical background of U.S. v. Joseph Sullivan
- Identify the charges and legal issues in the case
- Understand the ruling, sentencing, and observations
- Assess the implications for CISO criminal liability
Audience & prerequisites
Intended audience: Attorneys counseling businesses and CISOs on cybersecurity legal and regulatory risk.
Level: intermediate
Prerequisites: None
Faculty
Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard
Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare
Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.
Amie Rooney, Associate General Counsel and Senior Director, Ethics & Compliance, Marvell Technology, Inc.
Marvell Technology, Inc.
Amie Rooney is Associate General Counsel and Senior Director of Ethics and Compliance at Marvell Technology, Inc., the semiconductor company, based in Santa Clara, California. She studied law at Georgetown University Law Center, sits on the board of THE CAMPAIGN for Legal Services, and served as vice president of the Federal Bar Association's Northern California chapter from 2021 to 2024. At Legal Cyber Academy she teaches on cybercrime and enforcement, including the U.S. v. Joe Sullivan trial, and on board cyber readiness.
Timed agenda
| # | Topic | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CISO Criminal Liability: U.S. v. Joseph Sullivan | 63 |
| 2 | Facts and Background | — |
| 3 | Issues and Charges | — |
| 4 | Ruling, Sentencing, and Observations | — |
| 5 | Key Takeaways: Dispelling Cyber Criminal Liability Rumors | — |
| Total instructional time | 63 |
Self-submission by credit type
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.
CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)
Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.
CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)
Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.