Continuing Education Information Sheet
Maximizing Case Efficiency: Untapped Potential of Using Discovery Referees and Special Masters in ADR
- Provider
- Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com - Delivery method
- On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
- Instructional time
- 1h 7m
- Assessment
- Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
- Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.
Equivalent credit hours
1.1 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.3 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.
Learning objectives
- Describe the role and types of special masters
- Explain the growth in special master appointments
- Apply the Federal Rules governing appointments
- Select and retain a discovery referee or special master effectively
Audience & prerequisites
Intended audience: Litigators and ADR practitioners handling complex, technology-related disputes.
Level: intermediate
Prerequisites: None
Faculty
Yoav Griver, Partner, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP
Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP
Yoav M. Griver is a partner in the litigation group at Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, where his practice covers commercial and financial litigation, copyright and intellectual property litigation, and e-discovery and cybersecurity. He defended Hitachi America in what his firm describes as the longest customs fraud trial in the history of the Court of International Trade, and MasterCard against multidistrict class claims that it was responsible under RICO for internet gambling. Earlier he was litigation counsel at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and prosecuted banking conspiracy, stock fraud and other cases for Israel's Ministry of Justice. He is an adjunct professor at NYU teaching sports law, a co-editor and author of the treatise Dispute Resolution and e-Discovery, and an Order of the Coif graduate of the University of Texas School of Law. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on phishing, trade secret disputes and ADR, and current eDiscovery practice.
Hon. Richard Kramer, Mediator, Arbitrator and Special Master, JAMS (Hon., Ret.)
Hon. Richard Kramer (Ret.) is a full-time mediator, arbitrator and special master at JAMS, based in San Francisco. He served eighteen and a half years on the San Francisco Superior Court, including thirteen years presiding over its Complex Litigation Department from 2002 to 2015, handling antitrust, employment, insurance coverage, construction defect, mass tort, class action and environmental matters, as well as coordinated proceedings spanning thousands of cases statewide. Before the bench he practised commercial trial law for 24 years. He holds a J.D. from the University of Southern California School of Law, where he was inducted into the Order of the Coif, and has taught as an adjunct professor at UC Hastings College of the Law. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on the use of discovery referees and special masters in ADR.
Claude M. Stern, Neutral, JAMS; former Chair, IP Litigation, Quinn Emanuel
Claude M. Stern is a neutral with JAMS in Silicon Valley, serving as a mediator, arbitrator, special master, discovery referee, and neutral evaluator. He brings more than 40 years of experience in intellectual property, licensing, allegedly defective technology, and complex civil litigation, and served as chair or co-chair of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's national intellectual property litigation practice from 2003 through 2021, where he was lead trial counsel in precedent-setting patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, and licensing cases. He has lectured in Stanford Law School's trial advocacy course since 1992. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on the underused role of discovery referees and special masters in resolving complex disputes.
Timed agenda
| # | Topic | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximizing Case Efficiency: Untapped Potential of Using Discovery Referees and Special Masters in ADR | 67 |
| Total instructional time | 67 |
Self-submission by credit type
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.
CLE (attorneys)up to 1.1 hr (60-min basis)
Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.
CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.1 hr (60-min basis)
Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.