Continuing Education Information Sheet
Ethics of Using ChatGPT: Pitfalls & Effective Uses
- Provider
- Legal Cyber Academy · Lexeprint Inc.
13413 Granger Ave, Orlando, FL 32827
info@lawandforensics.com · https://www.lexeprint.com - Delivery method
- On-demand, self-study (online, recorded)
- Instructional time
- 1h 3m
- Assessment
- Graded multiple-choice exam · pass mark 70%
- Administered online, unproctored, with identity verified only to the level of a confirmed email address. Each sitting draws 10questions at random from the course’s pool, is timed, and is fixed for that sitting; correct answers are never disclosed. The pass mark is provider-set and is not supported by published reliability statistics or a standard-setting panel.
Equivalent credit hours
1.0 on a 60-minute basis (most CLE / general CE) · 1.2 on a 50-minute basis (NASBA CPE). Rounded down to the nearest tenth of an hour; your board may round differently.
Learning objectives
- Explain how artificial intelligence, machine learning, and generative AI work
- Identify the ethical and legal pitfalls of using AI and the applicable ABA Model Rules
- Apply AI effectively to streamline legal work while avoiding human error
- Anticipate the short- and long-term impact of AI on the legal profession
Audience & prerequisites
Intended audience: Attorneys wanting to use generative AI tools responsibly while upholding professional ethical standards.
Level: beginner
Prerequisites: None
Faculty
Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard
Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare
Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.
Ryan Abbott, Mediator and Arbitrator, JAMS; Professor of Law and Health Sciences, University of Surrey
JAMS
Ryan Abbott is a mediator, arbitrator, and court-appointed neutral with JAMS, handling intellectual property, health care, life sciences, and technology disputes. He is Professor of Law and Health Sciences at the University of Surrey School of Law and Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and is a licensed physician, a patent attorney in California and New York, a solicitor advocate in England and Wales, and a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. He wrote The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2020) and leads the Artificial Inventor Project, the pro bono series of test cases behind the world's first patent granted for an invention made by an AI. He co-created the JAMS AI Dispute Resolution Rules and holds an M.D. from UC San Diego, a J.D. from Yale, and a Ph.D. from Surrey. At Legal Cyber Academy, Ryan Abbott teaches on the ethics of using ChatGPT, including its pitfalls and effective uses.
Bradford Newman, Partner and Head of Complex Technology Disputes (US), Eversheds Sutherland
Baker McKenzie
Bradford Newman is a partner at Eversheds Sutherland and the firm's Head of Complex Technology Disputes (US), based in Silicon Valley, where he joined when the firm opened that office in 2025. He serves as lead trial counsel in national and cross-border high-stakes technology and trade secret litigation, and advises boards and C-suites on governance and regulatory risk in artificial intelligence, blockchain, decentralized finance and cryptocurrency. He is the founder and longtime co-chair of the American Bar Association's AI and Blockchain Subcommittee and edits the trade secrets chapter of the ABA Business Law Section's Annual Review. He previously chaired Baker McKenzie's North America Trade Secrets Practice, and is ranked by Chambers USA in trade secrets. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on ransomware and forensics, and on artificial intelligence and its regulation in legal practice.
Timed agenda
| # | Topic | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overview of Artificial Intelligence and How it Works | 63 |
| 2 | Pitfalls of Using AI for Attorneys | — |
| 3 | Effective Uses of AI for Attorneys | — |
| 4 | Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Legal Profession | — |
| Total instructional time | 63 |
Self-submission by credit type
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.
- Addresses legal ethics / professional responsibility — may qualify for ethics-specialty CLE where your jurisdiction recognizes it.
CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)
Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.
CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)
Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.
Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited continuing-education provider, and its courses are not pre-approved for CLE, CE, CME, or CPE credit. Each course provides a graded assessment, a verifiable Certificate of Completion, and a Continuing Education Information Sheet documenting instructional time, learning objectives, faculty, and a timed agenda — the records most licensing bodies require when a learner applies for self-submitted or self-study credit. Whether credit is granted, and how much, is determined solely by your licensing board. Confirm your board's rules before claiming credit. Verify certificates at https://www.legalcyberacademy.com/certificate/ <code>.