Continuing Education Information Sheet

• Apply the relevant Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to smartphone evidence
• Apply the Federal Rules of Evidence to smartphone data
• Identify the key factors for the admissibility of smartphone evidence
• Extract lessons from recent smartphone-evidence cases

Intended audience: Litigators who need to leverage smartphone evidence and ensure it withstands courtroom scrutiny.

Level: intermediate

Prerequisites: None

• Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard

  Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare

  Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.

• Jeffrey Rosenfeld, Of Counsel, Blank Rome LLP

  Blank Rome LLP

  Jeffrey Rosenfeld is Of Counsel at Blank Rome LLP, where his practice focuses on litigation involving corporate governance, entertainment, intellectual property, and bankruptcy. He represents company officers and directors as well as actors, musicians, producers, and other creative talent, and also advises high-profile individuals and businesses facing cybersecurity and personal security threats. He has co-authored a chapter on the use of special masters in an eDiscovery treatise and has been repeatedly listed as a Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Star.

• Genevieve Sauter, Partner, NoonanLance

  Genevieve M. Sauter is a partner at NoonanLance in San Diego, where she handles complex business and civil litigation. Her practice spans litigation strategy, eDiscovery, dispositive motion practice, trial, and arbitration, and she has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in general civil, business, financial services, and intellectual property disputes. She was previously an associate at Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge and was admitted to the State Bar of California in 2012. At Legal Cyber Academy she teaches on handling and presenting smartphone evidence in the courtroom.

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.

• CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

  Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.

• CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

  Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.