Continuing Education Information Sheet

• Understand how AI and technology-assisted review (TAR) are used in eDiscovery
• Apply relevant ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct to AI use
• Evaluate the benefits and efficiencies AI brings to litigation
• Anticipate the future direction of AI in the legal profession

Intended audience: Litigators and eDiscovery practitioners seeking to incorporate AI into their workflow.

Level: intermediate

Prerequisites: None

• Daniel B. Garrie, Founder, Law & Forensics; Neutral at JAMS; Faculty at Harvard

  Law & Forensics LLC · JAMS · Harvard · Rutgers Law School · Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare

  Daniel B. Garrie is the founder and executive managing partner of Law & Forensics LLC, a boutique cybersecurity and forensic engineering firm he co-founded in 2008. He serves as a neutral, arbitrator, and forensic special master at JAMS, focusing on cybersecurity, cryptocurrency, and complex technology disputes, and holds faculty appointments at Harvard and Rutgers Law School. A patented software inventor and prolific author, he is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law & Cyber Warfare and a widely cited authority on computer forensics, eDiscovery, and cyber litigation.

• Dan Nichols, Attorney, JurisLaw LLP

  JurisLaw LLP

  Daniel J. Nichols is a litigator and trial lawyer at JurisLaw LLP, where he leads the firm's eDiscovery practice. He serves as discovery counsel in class actions brought by consumers, including customers of large corporations and victims of Ponzi schemes, alongside a mold injury and class action litigation practice, and is a former partner of the eDiscovery firm Redgrave LLP. He has taught civil discovery at Lewis & Clark Law School for nine years, previously chaired Oregon's Uniform Civil Jury Instruction committee, and serves on the Oregon Advisory Committee on Civil Justice. He earned his J.D. magna cum laude from the J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University. At Legal Cyber Academy he teaches on artificial intelligence in eDiscovery and on mediating to reduce e-discovery costs.

• Patricia Antezana, Counsel, Reed Smith LLP

  Reed Smith LLP

  Patricia E. Antezana is counsel at Reed Smith LLP in Pittsburgh, working in the firm's litigation and e-discovery practices. She manages electronic discovery across the litigation lifecycle, advising on legal holds and preservation, early case assessment, ESI protocols, collections, document review, privilege issues and productions, and has run large-scale review projects in complex litigation. Her wider litigation background covers commercial disputes, business torts and product liability defence. She holds a J.D. from Boston College Law School and an A.B. in government, cum laude, from Harvard College, and is admitted in Pennsylvania. At Legal Cyber Academy she teaches on artificial intelligence and cloud computing in eDiscovery.

• Jonathan Redgrave, Partner and Chair of the Executive Committee, Redgrave LLP

  Redgrave LLP

  Jonathan M. Redgrave is a partner at Redgrave LLP and chairs the firm's executive committee. His practice covers eDiscovery and information law, information governance, data privacy and cybersecurity; he serves as discovery counsel for Fortune 100 companies in complex litigation, as a testifying expert in eDiscovery disputes over preservation, collection and production, and as a special master and discovery neutral. He helped conceive and found The Sedona Conference Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production in 2002, chaired it for its first five years and is now its chair emeritus, and is editor-in-chief of The Sedona Principles. He holds a J.D. cum laude from the University of Minnesota Law School and sits on the boards of Lawyers for Civil Justice and the Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals. At Legal Cyber Academy, Jonathan Redgrave teaches on artificial intelligence and the future of eDiscovery.

Legal Cyber Academy is not an accredited provider; the notes below explain how a learner may self-submitthis activity where their board permits. The pathways shown reflect this course’s subject matter. Always confirm your board’s current rules.

• CLE (attorneys)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

  Many U.S. jurisdictions let an attorney apply for CLE credit for a non-accredited program (often called individual attorney or self-application). Use this certificate plus the course Information Sheet as your supporting documentation. Your state bar or CLE board decides whether credit is granted, how much, and any self-study cap.

• CE / CPD (privacy, insurance, IT)up to 1.0 hr (60-min basis)

  Where your professional body recognizes self-reported or self-directed learning (CPD) — for example many privacy (CIPP/CIPM) and security certifications — record this activity using the certificate and Information Sheet. Confirm your program's self-reporting rules and any documentation it requires.