Legal Cyber Academy
Standard or guidanceFreeCurrent

ENFSI Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science

European Network of Forensic Science Institutes · Approved version 3.0; foreword dated 8 March 2015 · 2015

Access and status

Cost

Free

Free to read or download at source. No account, no purchase.

Status

Current

Current as at the verification date below. Standards and tools both move — confirm at source before you rely on it.

What it is

The output of ENFSI's STEOFRAE project (Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe): a guideline on evaluating findings against competing propositions and reporting the strength of that evaluation, with an audit template, an implementation roadmap and nine worked case examples.

Who it is for, and when

Read it if your reports contain opinions rather than only observations. It is the most practical free introduction to the likelihood-ratio framework that ISO 21043-4 now requires in principle, and the worked examples — including a CCTV case — show what the reasoning looks like on the page.

What it does not cover

The worked examples are drawn mainly from DNA, glass, footwear, speaker recognition and gunshot residue; there is no computer or mobile forensics example, so the transfer to digital evidence is left to the reader. It is a guideline for reporting scientists, not a court rule, and it is dated 2015.

Go to the source

Open at enfsi.eu (opens in a new tab)

https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/m1_guideline.pdf

Details

Type
Standard or guidance
Written for
Working examinerLawyers and courtsAdvancedWorking examiner, Lawyers and courts, Advanced
Publisher
European Network of Forensic Science Institutes
Version verified
Approved version 3.0; foreword dated 8 March 2015
Year
2015
Topics
evaluative-reporting, interpretation, reporting, expert-testimony, eu-practice
Checked at source
Standards are revised. Confirm the current revision with the publisher before citing this.